Pascal's Thoughts disagree that the most cynical argument is that a person can not be sure of something separate from real pure revelation or faith that is based on faith. This intuition is the only source of information and strong-mind for their own religious ideas can not be certain of the principal beliefs derived from instinct, and that religion is a matter of private choice very early source of reliable knowledge. Pascal says that the reliability of the information obtained, if our senses depends on the ability of the source itself, as if something has been created by God, which is reliable. standard of knowledge between skeptics and dogmatists is that the question dogmatic principles are not accepted - they assume the existence of reliable knowledge in particular. Pascal was a dogma itself. Quite the contrary, skeptics doubt that the reluctance of the consequences of knowledge in the uncertainty of resources to understand nature itself.
As Pascal says, the humanity of nature prohibits constant doubts and at the same time he was a human being can justify the information. Human beings are not aware of the situation and, therefore, ignorant of the reliability of the faculties. Thus, the disagreement of Pascal can be complete - the lack of motivation of faith ends in skepticism. In contrast, dogmatism, if a person hears the information - which may serve as a basis for understanding normal transition to competition in the revealed knowledge. Pascal believes that the fall of man is the cause of skepticism. Since the fall, humanity is in the state of both lying and truth - that the exhibition is partially known, but not in all subjects. Even those who choose to remain disinterested are basically skeptics.
Speaking of Descartes, Pascal seen himself as a skeptic. For Descartes, the information can see the truth in cases where there is no doubt on the conviction that knowledge. Descartes did not recognize God as the knowledge base, however, with Pascal, who viewed God as the only reliable source of truth. Descartes says we can not rely on the literal sense as the true sources of knowledge in this way the point can not be trusted. Instead, laws can not be established in a complete vacuum without any influence of the net source of external forces of nature and time.